![]() On the other hand, if you are looking for something that you can take on a trip, the ideal choice is a makeup bag that can slip into your luggage. If the makeup bag is meant to be stored in a handbag, you need something compact. ![]() When looking for a makeup bag, the first thing to do is to know your needs, as this will help you decide which makeup bag is best for you. Choose the makeup bag according to your needs.If you want to know more about the different bag models on the market, discover our TOP 10 makeup bags for 2022. If you prefer a more polished look, you'll probably need enough space for foundation, powder, blush, mascara and more.Ī medium-sized makeup bag is also versatile enough to carry a few beauty essentials, or more items when you need them. Even the most discerning makeup buffs love this kind of little makeup bag for those times when they can only carry a few essentials with them. Most of these makeup bags are the size of a pencil case and have a zipper. If you only use a few essentials such as powder, lipstick and a bit of mascara, you can get by with a small makeup pouch that will easily find its place in your vanity or in your handbag. And when you find the perfect makeup bag, you'll find it much easier to locate your beauty products, so you can get your makeup on without wasting time. Have no fear, in this article we present 5 tips on how to choose the perfect makeup bag. Indeed, size and durability can make a big difference in its performance. So inevitably, the choice of the right kit depends on the use you make of it on a daily basis or when traveling. A good makeup bag allows you to be well organized and have your hands on your makeup in the blink of an eye. And the good news is that our team knows exactly how to help you easily find the one that suits your needs.Ĭhoosing a makeup bag is important for organizing your cosmetic items. Note that these are not arguments against using Google Safebrowsing at all but only arguments against relying too much only on Google Safebrowsing.Is your makeup piling up in all the drawers, purses and other pockets you have? Are you looking for a makeup bag to store everything in one place, but don't know which one to choose? But there are environments where one rather has a higher recall even if the false positive rate gets larger, i.e. Increasing the recall would increase the false positive rate so that they classify too much safe pages as malicious. This means that one in 10 phishing pages will not be classified as such. Thus it might be useful to additionally get other sources which don't have this but another bias.Īlso according to their paper they target a recall of 90% to keep the false positive rate at a low 0.1%. This means that the input is biased in a way that an attacker has a good chance of late detection if not targeting gmail users. From reading the paper it looks like that they get their input mainly from links to gmail users and a few information reported by the users. But it still might be considered a privacy problem in some environments.Īpart from that relying only on Google Safebrowsing might not be sufficient. This is done to reduce the chance of false positives because the online check has the most up-to-date information. While Google Safebrowsing is today mostly an offline check against some local database they still require that the browser queries google directly before presenting the phishing warning to the user. My question is, would there be any reason not to rely on Safe Browsing?Ĭonversely, given the popularity of Chrome (and Firefox, which maintains their own blacklist also queries Safe Browsing in case the URL doesn't contain an entry in their list), would there be any reason to opt using a browser extension instead? (like SpoofGuard and Netcraft)Īdditionally, why would a company invest in phishing solutions (not enough rep points, see the solutions provided by: Entrust, PhishMe, LookingGlassCyber) when they can just use Safe Browsing? After all, the blacklist is generated by a machine learning algorithm, trained daily with tens of millions of data (assuming the "blacklist" they refer to in the paper is indeed the one used by Safe Browsing). Their blacklist does not suffer from the drawback of being unable able to detect zero-hour phishing attacks. I understand that Google Safe Browsing relies on a constantly updated blacklist in order to classify webpages. I'm currently undertaking my thesis regarding phishing detection.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |